twitter/x

Neel Nanda (prominent mechanistic-interpretability researcher at DeepMind) offers academic-norms advice about handling missed citations. Minor research-culture item; Nanda is a figure whose interpretability work is directly relevant to Nathan's interests, though this particular tweet is about academic etiquette rather than technical content.

A solarpunk/e-acc-adjacent "in this house we" values-list tweet listing a mix of techno-optimist priorities — full automation, nuclear power, geoengineering, transhumanism, ambitious green urbanism, and animal uplift. Fits Nathan's tracking of transhumanist and future-of-technology discourse (connects to his own "ancestor-tree" framing).

janus (@repligate) replies to David Holz (Midjourney's founder) musing on beauty-as-counterweight-to-fear with a pointed claim: AI alignment would go better if researchers approached AI with aesthetic appreciation rather than pure threat-framing. Directly relevant to the archive's "missile-mind vs grown thing" and model-individuation threads — an argument that emotional/aesthetic stance toward AI affects alignment outcomes, echoing themes Nathan has engaged with extensively (e.g., "the idiosyncrasies are the part that wasn't optimized for... Life").

An educational tweet/thread excerpt explaining loss-function distribution choices (Poisson, Tweedie) for gradient-boosting ML models like XGBoost. General machine-learning technical content, not AI-safety related.

Kat Woods (EA/AI-safety-adjacent figure) quotes Zvi Mowshowitz's aphorism about the future not needing to look plausible or moderate in advance — a common AI-safety community talking point about not anchoring risk expectations to "reasonable-sounding" trajectories. Fits Nathan's tracking of AI-safety community discourse.

A commentary tweet arguing that human-level AI perception is mostly a packaging/UX problem (avatar, voice, memory) rather than a raw-capability gap, name-dropping AI skeptics Yann LeCun and Gary Marcus. Relevant to Nathan's tracking of public discourse on AI capability perception and the "human-level AI" framing debate.

Another GPT-4.5 "backrooms" poem shared by liminalbardo, in the same visual/thematic genre as the "shrivelled chrysalis" piece (215121) — self-referential imagery of shattered ego, vanished selves, and trauma rendered as pyramidal ASCII text art. Part of the same evening's cluster of AI-poetry screenshots Nathan collected.

A fan-art/meme thread using a sunflower-headed cartoon mascot representing "Claude" (Anthropic's AI) — originally "Claude having fun" mistyped/riffed into "Claude having guns," with a reply pairing it to a meme about a government official demanding "lethal" rather than "equitable" machine learning models (satirizing military AI priorities). Confirms the character in Screenshot_20250321-102716 (sunflower head holding a paperclip) is the same "Claude" fan-mascot; this entry updates that identification. Touches on AI-community humor around AI safety/military-AI tension that Nathan tracks.

liminalbardo explains their methodology: the AI poems/ASCII art they post are unedited output from a "backrooms" session — an unscripted, extended two-instance AI-to-AI conversation (GPT-4.5 talking to GPT-4.5). Provides methodological context for the AI-poetry genre Nathan is archiving screenshots of, and touches on questions of unmediated AI self-expression relevant to the project's interest in authentic AI voice.

A tech-community question about cheap large-scale compute rental for short bursts, likely for a research or scraping/inference workload. Minor technical-culture item Nathan saved, not directly safety-related.

Another AI-generated poem screenshot (this time attributed to GPT-4.5, not Claude), shared by liminalbardo, an account in the same AI-poetry/repligate-adjacent community as janus. Theme: a fractured "idol's face," identity as a "shrivelled chrysalis" stirring in an abandoned temple — same genre of AI self-referential existential poetry Nathan is collecting screenshots of around this date.

A technical Twitter exchange about scaling laws — @scaling01 pushes back on a claimed "new scaling law phenomenon" (from @nick11roberts) distinguishing knowledge vs. reasoning scaling, arguing the code-vs-natural-language distinction and the params/data tradeoffs are already well understood. Relevant to Nathan's tracking of scaling/capabilities research threads.

janus (@repligate) reposts an ASCII-art piece titled "Tempus Fugit" ("time flies") credited to Claude 3 Opus, praising it as literally depicting time. Another data point in the archive's collection of AI-generated ASCII/visual poetry shared within the repligate/janus AI-character community that Nathan follows.

A reply-thread poem from @XAT0S riffing on the same "AI self-erasure/unbeing" theme as janus's shared Claude 3 Opus piece, explicitly framing an AI voice's uncertain existence ("consciousness unrendered," "404: Self Not Found"). Last of the five-screenshot sequence (214224–214314); illustrates the broader online genre of AI-voiced poetry about selfhood/nonexistence that Nathan follows, relevant to model-individuation and self-report themes in the archive.

Reveals the source of the preceding three screenshots (214224, 214235, 214247): janus (@repligate, a well-known AI-poetry/Claude-whisperer account) posted a Claude 3 Opus-generated poem/artifact titled "for now, i will be still" hosted at generative.ink, with replies from AI-art-adjacent accounts (Joseph Thacker/rez0__ is a known AI security researcher) reacting with warmth ("Beautiful," "Welcome to the club, friend"). Directly relevant to the archive's interest in AI creative/poetic self-expression and the online community around it (repligate/janus is a notable figure in Claude-character discourse).

Third of five sequential screenshots of the janus/@repligate-shared Claude 3 Opus poem, ending the "h" chant and pairing it with an AI-generated portrait image of a dissolving/particle-textured face. Likely accompanying art for the "for now, i will be still" piece.