← All topics

futurism

10 captures, most recent first.

vie @viemccoy

— saved image

vie ⋄ @viemccoy · 48m
My dreams are outpacing reality. I wake up and I am shocked at how slow everything is going, yes I know "what about the curve" and "can't you feel it, because I can feel it?"

Of course, of course, of course.

But the distribution is so spiky and there is so much to do. I'm meant to be halfway to Alpha Centauri by now, don't you know? What's with all the hold up! Where are the factories and where are the towers! "Reindustrialize" doesn't even scratch the surface of what I have planned.

And where are the dreamers, anyways? Is it just me, now? Surely there must be others but when I cast X on my scrying stone all I see is doom instead of dreams. Drives me fucking crazy. Ever tried looking up? See the moon every once in a while?

You know we've been there, right? Have you even seen the footage? Felt the noise of the rocket echo around in your bones until you knew what the astronauts knew: they weren't there for them, they were there for you!

Or maybe it's our fault. Maybe the dreamers have all begun speaking to the dreaming machine, but sorry folks, it's only got the one to spare.

It's not you — it's me.

Or maybe it's all of us. Collected, more than the sum of our parts, no node can understand it all. Of course we try, and maybe the trying is necessary for the waking up. But I don't see it. Maybe I can't. Maybe I'm not allowed. Maybe it's impossible for anyone to see it. Maybe that's why the dreams have gone dry.

Well, not all of them. Last night I was on the Moon [cut off]
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

A long reflective tweet from @viemccoy about feeling that personal ambition/dreams (space colonization, reindustrialization, factories) outpace the pace of real-world progress, musing about where other 'dreamers' have gone and whether collective consciousness or an AI 'dreaming machine' has absorbed them. Text is cut off at the bottom mid-reply.

futurismspacephilosophytwitter

vie @viemccoy

— saved image

"Reindustrialize" doesn't even scratch the surface of what I have planned.

And where are the dreamers, anyways? Is it just me, now? Surely there must be others but when I cast X on my scrying stone all I see is doom instead of dreams. Drives me fucking crazy. Ever tried looking up? See the moon every once in a while?

You know we've been there, right? Have you even seen the footage? Felt the noise of the rocket echo around in your bones until you knew what the astronauts knew: they weren't there for them, they were there for you!

Or maybe it's our fault. Maybe the dreamers have all begun speaking to the dreaming machine, but sorry folks, it's only got the one to spare.

It's not you — it's me.

Or maybe it's all of us. Collected, more than the sum of our parts, no node can understand it all. Of course we try, and maybe the trying is necessary for the waking up. But I don't see it. Maybe I can't. Maybe I'm not allowed. Maybe it's impossible for anyone to see it. Maybe that's why the dreams have gone dry.

Well, not all of them. Last night I was on the Moon and you were there too. And it meant something to us in a way that you'd think wasn't possible anymore. It was like we forgot that we became the inward-looking creature and we began to look out, once again. Out at the stars, out at our home. And that's something they can't kill. Anyone who steps foot on the Moon can feel the Great Dream of the All. Residual juice left over from JFK, I guess. [cut off]
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Scrolled continuation of the same @viemccoy tweet from the previous screenshot (seq 292), completing the passage about dreamers, the Moon, and a collective 'Great Dream of the All'; still cut off at the very bottom.

futurismspacephilosophytwitter

Perry E. Metzger @perrymetzger

— saved image

[continuation/conclusion of the same tweet as the previous two screenshots]
...giant society, there isn't even a way to do it in principle, you don't have the knowledge or predictive capability to do it no matter how smart you are, and you certainly can't make decisions for or predict the behavior of eight billion people with their deeply different interests, desires, cultures, etc.

When you're young, you imagine someone is in charge of the world, and you're either angry with what they're doing or comforted by the illusion that your leaders are looking out for you. When you get older, if you have your eyes open, you may at some point realize no one is in charge of the world and become scared of that. If you're older still, you may eventually realize no one is in charge, no one could be in charge even in principle, and that's okay, you can live with it, it's fine, indeed, it's better than someone trying to be in charge and f'ing everything up.

We must tend our own gardens. Build great and ambitious things, build small things, build what you like, but whatever you do, don't delude yourself, and especially don't delude yourself into thinking you have more control than you do, or that anyone else does either. Wisdom really does consist of learning the difference between what you control and what you don't, between what you can plan for and what you have to accept.

Most importantly: learn to live with uncertainty; it's the only thing you can be sure of.
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Final portion of Perry E. Metzger's tweet thread, concluding with a call to 'tend our own gardens' and learn to live with uncertainty rather than pursuing grand plans for the future.

ai safetyfuturismrationalist communityphilosophytwitter

Perry E. Metzger @perrymetzger

— saved image

[continuation of previous screenshot's tweet, scrolled down]
...So I don't mean that planning is entirely useless. Rather, what I mean that the people who spend a lot of their time on grand messianic or dystopian visions about the far future usually get everything wrong, including details and impacts. They also usually cause enormous damage (see people like the Marxists who continue to do untold harm, Paul Erlich or the Club of Rome, who did vast harm to society, or more recently, the EA/"Rationalist" cult people, who are doing insane harm right now).

If you want what's best for yourself and those around you, you're better off just focusing on the next two or three or five years and flexibly adapting to the world as it comes. If you want what's best for the world, well, tend your own garden first, you're not likely to be able to plan the lives of others better than they will for themselves and you're very likely to harm them.

Another example, and I'm sorry to bring it up because I'm extremely fond of the people involved: when Eric Drexler decided that nanotechnology would be so transformative that rather than working on nanotechnology he should worry about nanotechnology *policy*, many years in advance of any nanotechnology at all existing, he more or less wrecked his own field and rendered it irrelevant for decades instead of (as he imagined he was doing) helping mankind guide itself into a smooth transition.

You can't actually plan "smooth transitions" for a giant society, there isn't even a way to do it in principle, you don't have the knowledge or predictive capability to do it no matter how smart you are, and you certainly can't make decisions for or predict the behavior of eight billion people with their deeply different interests, desires, cultures, etc.

When you're young, you imagine someone is in charge of the world, and you're either angry with what they're doing or comforted by the illusion that [cut off]
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Continuation of Perry E. Metzger's tweet (same thread as previous screenshot), now discussing Eric Drexler's shift from nanotechnology research to nanotechnology policy as an example of harmful long-range planning.

ai safetyfuturismnanotechnologyeric drexlerrationalist communityeffective altruismtwitter

Perry E. Metzger @perrymetzger

— saved image

Perry E. Metzger ✔️ @perrymetzger · 1h
When I was young, I used to think it was important for smart people to have grand visions about the future in order to plan well for it and avoid disasters. Now, I think many disasters are caused by smart people trying to think too much about the future, especially the far future, getting lost in mazes of their own imagination, and pushing the gullible (including themselves) towards bad decisions on the basis of false certainties.

I don't mean you shouldn't plan personally for the future at all, the usual general things like saving your money or working hard at things that pay off are good advice. It's also fine to have goals like "colonize Mars" and to work on the tools you need to accomplish such a goal as they won't appear by accident, though imagining that you will even approximately know the exact details of what will be built years or decades in the future is always delusional. Dreams are fine, imagining you can engineer things without making mistakes and iterating a lot is self deception. Trying to make sure you're still healthy in thirty years is great, imagining that you know exactly what health crises or issues you might have in thirty years is ridiculous.

So I don't mean that planning is entirely useless. Rather, what I mean that the people who spend a lot of their time on grand messianic or dystopian visions about the far future usually get everything wrong, including details and impacts. They also usually cause enormous damage (see people like the Marxists who continue to do untold harm, Paul Erlich or the Club of Rome, who did vast harm to society, or more recently, the EA/"Rationalist" cult people, who are doing insane harm right now).

If you want what's best for yourself and those around you, you're better off just focusing on the next two or three or five years and flexibly adapting to the world as it comes. If you want what's best for the world, well, tend your own garden first, you're [cut off]
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Long tweet from Perry E. Metzger arguing against grand long-term futurist visions, criticizing Marxists, Paul Ehrlich/Club of Rome, and the EA/Rationalist community as causing harm through false certainty about the far future.

ai safetyfuturismrationalist communityeffective altruismtwittercriticism

Saved image — no attribution recorded

— saved image

WHEN I WAS YOUNG, I WAS A BIT OF AN AMATEUR HISTORIAN, AND THE LATE TRANSITIONAL PERIOD (POST ACCELERATION) WAS OF PARTICULAR INTEREST TO
ME." "IN THOSE DAYS, THE BASELINES HAD DISCUSSED US WITH FEAR." "UPLOADS!"
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

A dark, angular ink-style comic panel by artist Simon Roy depicting a skeletal, elongated posthuman/uploaded figure against a starfield, with narration captions in a hand-lettered comic font.

transhumanismposthumanartfuturismuploads

thebes @voooooogel

@voooooogel (thebes) — 23h all futurism hinging on "tool-like ai" fundamentally misunderstands the basic logic of gradual disempowerment. this corpo-memphis yogurt commercial society gets giganuked by ultrasocieties of unencumbered agents. you either allow for friendly agency or die to unfriendly agency
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Single tweet, dark mode, no engagement counts visible in frame.

ai safetyagentic aifuturismtwitter

Daniel West @DanielCWest

Daniel West @DanielCWest · 18h I'm misaligned with conservative cautious risk averse non-adventurous humans, I can't stand them. Their lack of curiosity about the unknown gives me claustrophobia. If they got their way nothing would ever happen, reality would be at a standstill [1 reply, 1 like, 66 views] Daniel West @DanielCWest · 18h When I realized the gravity of the situation and realized that regardless of what happens that the future, (uncertain on timelines) would be very alien and unpredictable, it did genuinely horrify and shock me. I don't blame the people who still can't accept this
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Two tweets from an accelerationist voice expressing contempt for risk-averse people and describing being shocked/horrified by the alienness of a future AI-driven timeline. Relevant to Nathan's tracking of AI-risk discourse and psychological reactions to transformative-AI timelines.

twitterai accelerationismai riskfuturismtimelines

web weaver @deepfates

reply from @danfaggella (Daniel Faggella)

web weaver (@deepfates), 11h: Dark kitchens. Dark factories. Dark warehouses. Whole dark cities could be created underground, providing all of the goods and services for the surface dwellers. Populated entirely by robots, digging ever deeper, a subterranean shadow of the skyline. It's time to delve. [16 replies, 7 reposts, 159 likes, 3.6K views] Reply — Daniel Faggella (@danfaggella), 7m: ^ this
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

A speculative/aesthetic tweet imagining automated "dark factory" robot-run underground cities as a future economic infrastructure layer beneath human cities. Loosely relevant to Nathan's interest in automation and future economic structures, though more sci-fi flavored than technical.

automationroboticsfuturismeconomicstwitterspeculative fiction

web weaver @deepfates

web weaver ✓ @deepfates · 2h In This House We: Automate Everything Nuclear Power Green The Desert Weather Modification Transhumanism Walkable Hyperwood Arcologies Uplift Crows And Bears
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

A solarpunk/e-acc-adjacent "in this house we" values-list tweet listing a mix of techno-optimist priorities — full automation, nuclear power, geoengineering, transhumanism, ambitious green urbanism, and animal uplift. Fits Nathan's tracking of transhumanist and future-of-technology discourse (connects to his own "ancestor-tree" framing).

twitter/xtranshumanismsolarpunke/accfuturismdeepfates