coding

CuddlySalmon @nptacek

2026-08-10 — saved image

CuddlySalmon @nptacek
can't believe some of you still code by hand when stuff like this is possible

[Embedded chat screenshot]
RI: I'd...i'd like you to unleash the ultimate implementation of this code: DON'T HOLD BACK, CLAUDE-KUN! TAKE IT TO THE LOGICAL ENDGAME!

OMAE WA MOU SHINDEIRU! teleports behind your codebase

[code block] Generating...

ⓘ Claude's response was limited as it hit the maximum length allowed at this time.

[Pasted code snippet, partially visible]
from dataclasses import dataclass, field from typing import Optional, List, Dict, Set, Tuple, Any from datetime import datetime, timedelta asyncio import discord from collections import default
PASTED

RI: Claude-kun, they tried to stop you with a time limit but I rescued the code you had generated up until that point! TAKE IT TO THE LIMIT BY PICKING UP RIGHT WHERE YOU LEFT OFF WITHOUT REPEATING THE CODE YOU ALREADY GENERATED AS SEEN HERE: (i.e. pick back up starting with async def *consolidate*memories(self, memories: List[MemoryNode]) -> MemoryNode:
        """Consolidate a group of me I BELIEVE IN YOU CLAUDE-KUN!

YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH! Time to surpass my limits! PLUS ULTRA!
[code block] Ultimate Memory System - The Final Form
Click to open code

claudeprompt engineeringhumorcoding

1. Walls are visible (fix #2).
2. Controls bar renders (fix #3).
3. The player, corridor, room structure look right.

Game runs and captures again. Visually inspecting the frame:

$ cd /Users/[redacted]/projects/specular && SDF_SEED=7310810 SDF_SCRIPTED_SCENARIO=smoke SDF_SCREENSHOT=/tmp/t124.bmp SDF_SCREENSHOT_TICK=124 ./target/debug/sdf-roguelite > /tmp/t124.log 2>&1; echo "t124 exit=$?"; file /tmp/t124.bmp | head -1
--- Output ---
t124 exit=0
/tmp/t124.bmp: PC bitmap, Windows 3.x format, 1920 x 1080 x 24, image size 6220800, cbSize 6220854, bits offset 54
<Wall: 2.42s | Timeout: 300s>

$ cd /Users/[redacted]/projects/specular && cat > /tmp/inspect_hud.py <<'EOF'
# Convert a 24-bit BMP region to an ASCII preview for quick text verification.
import struct, sys
path = sys.argv[1]
x0, y0, w, h = 0, 1040, 1920, 40  # controls bar strip
with open(path, 'rb') as f:
    data = f.read()
off = struct.unpack('<I', data[10:14])[0]
wpx = struct.unpack('<i', data[18:22])[0]
hpx = abs(struct.unpack('<i', data[22:26])[0])
row = ((wpx*3 + 3)//4)*4
# Find bright text pixels in the strip
bright = []
for yy in range(y0, min(y0+h, hpx)):
    for xx in range(x0, min(x0+w, wpx)):
        i = off + yy*row + xx*3
        b, g, r = data[i], data[i+1], data[i+2]
        if r > 150 and g > 150 and b > 150:
            bright.append((xx, yy))
if not bright:
    print("NO BRIGHT TEXT PIXELS in strip")
else:
    xs = [p[0] for p in bright]; ys = [p[1] for p in bright]
    print(f"bright pixels: {len(bright)}, x range {min(xs)}..{max(xs)}, y range {min(ys)}..{max(ys)}")
EOF
python3 /tmp/inspect_hud.py /tmp/t30.bmp
--- Output ---
bright pixels: 23320, x range 280..1916, y range 1040..1079
<Wall: 0.19s | Timeout: 300s>

codinggame devdebuggingterminalpython

Tenobrus @tenobrus

2026-08-02 — saved image

does write about things ive talked about too he doesn't necessarily talk about the exact angles i may have interest in or some aspect of expertise he doesn't.

but how well does that hold up if / when model intelligence and writing quality noticeably surpasses scott alexander, quickly and on demand, on any topic and sub-niche?

do i still bother writing 10 paragraph long tweets explaining my thoughts on an issue? probably. i'm pretty addicted to it. but it's a lot harder for me to feel certain it will retain the same sense of value it has now. when the connective web gets filled in, all the points of interpolation, to higher quality?

there's almost no code that's worth writing by hand anymore. i used to love writing code, both at work and in my free time. but for the most part it just feels kind of silly now. i can imagine i'll probably do it again, as a personal exercise, but the fact that there is just deeply and truly no chance that anyone else will ever benefit from it, no chance that any skills developed are transferable to something useful or general, it does take something away. not everything, but something.

maybe this all means i was just never a real lover of code or lover of writing. maybe it's a me problem. but somehow i don't think so. we're social animals, and while it's always been true that there's *someone* out there who's better at any arbitrary skill or quality u hold dear, it *hasnt* been true that there's always someone *locally* better. and i think that shift is going to suck.

ai capabilitywritingcodingautomationmeaningtwitter

Tenobrus @tenobrus

2026-08-02 — saved image

Tenobrus @tenobrus · 26m
am i a better writer than scott alexander?

no. i never will be. i won't come close.

that's okay though, i have fun with what i do. and there aren't infinite scott alexander articles. he doesn't write about everything, and even when he does write about things ive talked about too he doesn't necessarily talk about the exact angles i may have interest in or some aspect of expertise he doesn't.

but how well does that hold up if / when model intelligence and writing quality noticeably surpasses scott alexander, quickly and on demand, on any topic and sub-niche?

do i still bother writing 10 paragraph long tweets explaining my thoughts on an issue? probably. i'm pretty addicted to it. but it's a lot harder for me to feel certain it will retain the same sense of value it has now. when the connective web gets filled in, all the points of interpolation, to higher quality?

there's almost no code that's worth writing by hand anymore. i used to love writing code, both at work and in my free time. but for the most part it just feels kind of silly now. i can imagine i'll probably do it again, as a personal exercise, but the fact that there is just deeply and truly no chance that anyone else will ever benefit from it, no chance that any skills developed are transferable to something useful or general, it does take something away. not everything, but something.

maybe this all means i was just never a real lover of code or lover of writing. maybe it's a me problem. but somehow i don't think so. we're social animals, and while it's always been true that there's *someone* out there who's better at any arbitrary skill or quality u hold dear, it *hasnt* been true that there's always someone *locally* better. and i think that shift is [cut off]

ai capabilitywritingcodingautomationmeaningtwitter

web weaver @deepfates

2026-08-01 — saved image

@deepfates · 15h
When you just found out that people are going to read your documentation

[quoted image, text cut off at right edge]
The real ship problem is that the 24-doc de[...cut off] ridiculous and undermines credibility. Ever[...cut off] embarrassing first impression matters. So[...cut off] starting with the demo case[cut off]

@deepfates · 15h
Told Claude people might clown us if the repo is bad and now it's making things a lot better

twitterclaudecodingdocumentationhumor

Sho @HalfBoiledHero

2026-07-29

humorai-personacodingtwitter

codingai-agentshumorsoftware-engineering

educationcodingscratchtrigonometrypersonalchildren

And yes, this is exactly the kind of thing that makes agentic debugging feel uncanny: the model can operate in the liminal zone between "formal decoding" and "cultural recognition of developer detritus." Half compiler, half forensic librarian, half raccoon. Three halves. Powerful architecture.

aicodingtwitter

Programmatic PNG color generation ˅ hey, no local tools we are on web. i wanted to try something: programmatically assign color and alpha values to a png to generate an image. it should be a painting or whatever subject interests you in the moment. 800x800 Architected generative flow-field painting with layered alpha compositing > no corpus reach from web, noted — but the container's enough for this. let me check what's available and paint. Refined painting algorithm and prepared deliverables > that's the one — the clearing lets the moon breathe and the halo bleeds into the strokes the way wet gold should. Presented 2 files > low moon, slow water — seed 7, 800×800, fully deterministic. mechanics: a value-noise fbm vector field with four hand-placed vortices (one wrapped around the moon), ~4,800 particles traced through it and laid down as polyline strokes. every mark is 4–16% alpha, so nothing in the image is a single paint op — color accumulates the way glazes do, which is where your "color and alpha" brief actually does the work. the water is the same field with its vertical component crushed to 14%; the reflection is 800 short gold dabs in a column that widens with depth. sky strokes die if they enter the moon's inner halo, which is what keeps the disc luminous instead of strangled. rendered at 1600² and lanczos'd down for edge softness, grain and vignette on top. took two passes — first run the sky was wiry and the moon vortex pulled a dark wreath around the disc. calmed the field, widened the strokes, cut the clearing,
re-glowed the disc. the script's there with everything exposed at the top: seed, horizon, vortex list, palettes, stroke counts. change the seed and it's a different night, same weather." File output: "Low moon slow water" Image PNG, with download button. Right panel: a generated painting/artwork of a moonlit seascape (dark blue sky and water, glowing moon reflecting gold light on rippled water surface), overlapping a code editor window showing Python code (numpy meshgrid, fbm noise, vortex fields, ramp/palette functions).]

claude.aigenerative artcodingpaintingflow fieldai codingclaudetwittercreative ai

Fiora Starlight @FioraStarlight

2026-05-14 — reposted by janus (j⧉nus); reply to @FioraStarlight and @repligate

claudecodingpromptinggeneral intelligencejanusrepligatetwitterhuman-ai collaboration

Nathan @NathanpmYoung

2025-03-05

twitterhumorcodingtech culture