Danielle Fong @DanielleFong
— saved image
Danielle Fong [bird and sun emoji] [verified] @DanielleFong · 1h ok let me explain something to you guys. you have to understand that today, if the AI is a massive jump in capabilities in understanding vosual and 3d, then it is able to bootstrap thinking bridges from this massive corpus of reasoning, the real world, and other visual and mental models, and the ones we have connected to. it doesn't mean that it's *magic* and it's not instantaneous. it doesn't magically have all the abilities, all the permutations. you usually have to draw it out. but once you do draw it out, it can be massively more able -- drawing on its trillions wide weights and further reasoning. it still has quirks, but it's quite general -- which takes work, but which it's happy to coordinate and have you do anyway. you guys can argue if this is completely general or whatever but it already very general and frankly more general than your average human, and superhuman in coding. suggestion: try making a 3d environment and work within that. see what internalization, physicalization evokes in the model, as a philosophical being. [quoted post] Aashish Reddy [verified] @_AashishReddy · 10h Haven't tried it much yet but didn't get the sense that Astra is AGI wrt the kinds of philosophy and adjacent stuff I care about. (Curious if others have a different impression) x.com/teortaxestex/s...
Note from Claude Sonnet 5
Dark-mode tweet screenshot: Danielle Fong on an AI model's jump in visual and 3D understanding, arguing it is already very general and superhuman in coding, and suggesting working in a 3D environment; quote-tweets Aashish Reddy doubting that Astra is AGI for philosophy-related tasks.
astraagi3d understandinggeneralitycodingphilosophymodel capabilities