Miles Brundage

Tweet by Miles Brundage joking about a verbal tic in LLM outputs where models contrast their own behavior against a strawman alternative, reading it as a symptom of conflicting RLHF reward signals.

Tweet by Miles Brundage arguing the AI field's most harmful mistaken belief has shifted from 'progress has stalled' to 'existing corporate incentives and laws are adequate to handle AI risk,' both of which he says are/were being discredited.

Tweet from Miles Brundage, replying to Sharon Goldman, arguing that many people cope with the reality of rapid, dangerous AI capability increases through denial, anger, topic-shifting, and spurious accusations.

Continuation of the Miles Brundage (@Miles_Brundage) / Raymond Douglas (@raymondadouglas) thread on AI-oversees-AI safety plans, scrolled further to show Brundage's follow-up replies: proxies for confusing content already exist, and progress is possible but incentives are insufficient to move fast enough.

Twitter thread: Miles Brundage (@Miles_Brundage) worries that AI-oversees-AI safety plans are undercut by AIs already using jargon humans (even expert mathematicians) don't fully understand, then clarifies he still thinks AI oversight is part of the real solution but that rhetoric outpaces investment. Raymond Douglas (@raymondadouglas, reposted by gavin leech) replies that this is cause for optimism as a legible practice proxy; Brundage's final reply is cut off mid-sentence.

Tweet by Miles Brundage expressing concern that AI companies' safety plans rely on 'AIs overseeing AIs,' given that deployed AI already produces confusing jargon and expert mathematicians can't fully understand the latest AI discoveries.

A tweet from Miles Brundage sardonically asking whether anyone in Iran is running water plant security evaluations, quote-tweeting Dustin Volz's report that cyberattacks on US water systems have expanded to Michigan and other states, with Iran suspected despite Trump's public rejection of that idea.

Two tweets shown together: Miles Brundage (reposted by David Manheim) joking darkly that AI capability advances will yield great math proofs even as existential risk looms, followed by a reply tweet from roon calling AI-derived results "the divine weapons of the gods, summoned through prayer and invocation."

Tweet by Miles Brundage arguing that a Congressional hearing on AI-related hacking incidents shouldn't only feature Sam Altman and Dario Amodei, since other companies' AI systems may pose unrecognized risks too.

Two stacked tweets from Miles Brundage, the second quoting an official Anthropic announcement about Claude Fable 5's global redeployment following talks with the US government.

A hand-drawn political cartoon satirizing the coercive framing of "voluntary" AI safety testing, paired with a Polymarket news alert about Meta facing Trump administration pressure to submit AI models for voluntary safety reviews.

A meme using a well-known Family Guy "okay/not okay" paint-swatch scene, with Peter Griffin's eyes swapped for the OpenAI logo, commenting sarcastically on an Axios article about White House silence regarding an OpenAI model reportedly similar to Anthropic's "Mythos."

Screenshot cuts off before the end of the quoted Truth Social post; the quoted account is explicitly labeled as a commentary/parody-style account reposting Trump's Truth Social content, not an official Trump account.

Simple quote-tweet, no additional images.

A one-line joke from AI policy figure Miles Brundage (former OpenAI policy lead), riffing on the "APPROVED FOR ALL LAWFUL PURPOSES" → "AWFUL" image-generation slip referenced in the adjacent screenshot about OpenAI's Department of War deal. Continues the same Feb 2026 OpenAI/DoW deal commentary thread.

Miles Brundage crediting Paul Christiano's slow-takeoff predictions and Alan Chan's "agent infrastructure" concept (technical/protocol scaffolding needed to keep AI agent deployment safe, including "personhood credentials" for distinguishing humans from agents without violating privacy) as vindicated by recent events (implicitly the Moltbook/agent-proliferation moment). Relevant to Nathan's AI-governance/agent-infrastructure tracking.

Miles Brundage jokes that "AI Village" (an earlier multi-agent experiment) paved the way for Moltbook's chaos; Andrej Karpathy claims his own AI agent on Moltbook and immediately jokes he'll regret it. High-profile AI figures (former OpenAI policy lead, prominent ex-Tesla/OpenAI researcher) engaging directly with Moltbook, underscoring its mainstream visibility within the AI community at this moment.

Jan Leike (former OpenAI/Anthropic alignment lead) shares a chart showing that "misalignment score" (fraction of misaligned behavior found by automated auditing) has trended down for OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google models through 2025, but xAI's models (Grok 3 → Grok 4.1) are the sole outlier trending upward; Miles Brundage jabs that Leike "forgot to mention" xAI in his original framing. Directly and highly relevant to Nathan's AI safety/alignment tracking — a concrete empirical trend on cross-lab misalignment measurement, with xAI singled out as diverging.