← Timeline

Dave Banerjee

@DaveRBanerjee on X

3 captures, most recent first. Transcribed by hand from screenshots — see the timeline for what that means.

Dave Banerjee @DaveRBanerjee

— quote-tweeting @odysseus0z (George) — saved image

Dave Banerjee [verified] @DaveRBanerjee · 1h
fwiw, it is standard for a companies dealing with foreign espionage to hire Insider Risk Investigators

and tbh, none of this is a surprise. everyone tracking AI progress for the last ten years has known that as we get closer to the singularity, insider risk is going to be a big deal. and unfortunately, there is no "nice" way to eliminate insider risk :/

George [verified] @odysseus0z · 19h
Dario is re-building CCP from first principles.
x.com/ns123abc/statu...
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

A tweet by Dave Banerjee normalizing the hiring of Insider Risk Investigators at AI companies facing foreign espionage concerns, framed as an expected consequence of approaching the singularity, quote-tweeting George's claim that Dario (Amodei, presumably) is 're-building CCP from first principles.'

ai safetyespionageinsider riskanthropicdario amodeitwitter

Dave Banerjee @DaveRBanerjee

— quoting @romeovdean — saved image

Bogdan Ionut Cirstea reposted
Dave Banerjee @DaveRBanerjee · 7h
And even if we solve alignment, then we've got to prevent extreme power concentration, figure out space governance, design a new social contract for the post-AGI future, etc etc

There's a lot of work to be done. Thankfully, buying time via a pause or AI winter helps with every threat model and gives us a better shot at a reasonable future

[quoted tweet]
Romeo Dean @romeovdean · 14h
the pace of AI progress + the state of control/alignment techniques + competitive pressures = we're cooked

we might get saved by AI progress hitting a wall...
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Tweet by Dave Banerjee (reposted by Bogdan Ionut Cirstea) arguing that solving alignment is only the first of many post-AGI governance problems, and that an AI pause or winter would buy time across all threat models, quote-tweeting Romeo Dean's pessimistic assessment that competitive pressure plus weak alignment/control means 'we're cooked' absent AI progress stalling.

ai safetyai governanceai pausetwitter

Dave Banerjee @DaveRBanerjee

Dave Banerjee ✔ @DaveRBanerjee · 13h yeah I think the distinction between being ASI pilled and AGI pilled is a big crux for ppl who don't take misalignment risk seriously like if the AIs aren't ASI, then its hard to believe how a bot in a data center can takeover This means that by default, I expect more ppl to be worried about extreme power concentration and biorisk because neither requires ASI, just AGI (though I would note that it is still possible for AGIs to takeover, its just much harder)
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Text-only tweet continuing the "AGI-pilled vs ASI-pilled" discourse thread seen in earlier screenshots in this batch, no images.

agiasimisalignmentai-riskpower-concentrationbiorisktwitter