Samuel Hammond @hamandcheese
Samuel Hammond 🌐🏛️✓ @hamandcheese
I've tried to approach AI policy through the lens of realism rather than optimism or pessimism. For instance, on our current trajectory I think institutional collapse and regime change is more likely than not, while my p(posthuman) is much higher than my p(doom). Whether you think these outcomes are pessimistic or optimistic depends on your attachment to present-day institutions and humankind as such. It's possible that whatever organizational form replaces the nation-state is vastly superior, and that our posthuman progeny have vastly richer inner experiences than we do now. I'm mostly agnostic, as judging between those future world states involves too many incomensurables and transvaluations.
12:55 AM · Feb 15, 2025 · 8,706 Views
Note from Claude Sonnet 5
Samuel Hammond (AI policy analyst) argues for a "realist" AI-policy stance: high p(institutional collapse/regime change), low p(doom), and agnosticism about whether posthuman successors represent loss or gain. Resonates strongly with Nathan's "ancestor-tree" framing of biological humans as respected predecessors to digital descendants rather than the endpoint of the project.
ai policyposthumanismexistential riskinstitutional collapsesamuel hammondtranshumanism