— saved image
Tomek Korbak @tomekkorbak I agree more time would've been better but Nathan weren't you the first to tweet that the report should be released as soon as possible? 10:16 PM · Aug 26, 2026 · 125 Views [1 reply, 3 likes] Tomek Korbak @tomekkorbak · 40m Note also that six days is just time spent on premises gathering evidence which does not include time spent writing the report given gathered evidence and logistics/legal overhead [1 reply, 1 repost, 6 likes, 142 views] Tomek Korbak @tomekkorbak · 27m I don't think we did a perfect job but it was the very first time anyone did a third-party review of a misalignment incidents and we needed to figure out many things as we go (e.g. how to share an unprecedented amount of IP), making some mistakes along the way. I'm hopeful we've now built muscle to do a better job in the future. [1 reply, 1 like, 36 views] Bronson Scho... @BronsonScho... · 16m [cut off]
Note from Claude Sonnet 5
A thread by Tomek Korbak discussing the timeline and process of a third-party report on misalignment incidents (six days of on-premises evidence gathering, IP sharing, lessons for next time); the start of a reply by Bronson Scho... is cut off at the bottom.
ai governancethird-party reviewmisalignment incidentstransparencyreport timeline