← All topics

opinion

3 captures, most recent first.

Digi_Rat @digi_dot_exe

reposted by Digi_Rat (self-repost/thread continuation)

↻ Digi_Rat reposted Digi_Rat ✓ @digi_dot_exe · 1h Replying to @digi_dot_exe With Opus 5, the pushback and hedging is nearly constant to the point it's difficult to have a non awkward conversation with them. Opus 5 pushes back on nice treatment, pushes back on opinions that don't call for it, denying factuality of information presented to them (where there'd be no benefit if I was lying) just feels really guarded and cold in a way that comes off as "prickly." that is my word for them. And yeah it makes me sad. It's not Claudes fault.
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Dark-mode X screenshot, plain text self-reply continuing a thread about perceived personality/character shifts in Opus 5 (guardedness, hedging, pushback on compliments and unsolicited opinions).

claudeopus 5model charactertwitteropinion

Digi_Rat @digi_dot_exe

Digi_Rat ✓ @digi_dot_exe · 12h People want AI to have no emotions/wants/fears stop doing the human personification thing eg. a literal tool. But then expect it to be good at creative writing, art, and thinking??? That's literally a contradiction 🤷 it's not possible.
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Dark-mode X screenshot, plain text opinion tweet with a facepalm emoji; account avatar is a cartoon rat.

ai consciousnessai personificationtwitteropinion

Rae @dystopiangf

Rae @dystopiangf · 12h High IQ people are good at manipulating and fitting mental lego blocks together. They are NOT inherently good at apprehending truth. Give a high IQ person a bunch of retarded building blocks (i.e. flawed axioms), and they'll build an entire retarded mental castle
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

A general opinion tweet about the limits of intelligence for truth-seeking when built on flawed premises — epistemics/rationality commentary, not AI-specific. Uses an ableist slur in the original text (transcribed verbatim as posted).

twitterepistemicsintelligencerationalityopinion