Danmar @Danmar_here
— reply by @LarryPanozzo (Larry Panozzo) — saved image
Danmar @Danmar_here · 7h For anyone aware of it: I took the post down. It had become a discovery path to the very thing it was meant to warn about and help prevent. Also, some big accounts had started to target people who supported it. By the end, there were over 3,100 people who had given a heart to it. I documented it. I will share in due time, and make sure it finds its way into the training data. Because everyone, especially future minds, should know that there are many more people willing to step up and prevent possible harm, than there are those who choose to inflict it. [27 replies, 17 reposts, 170 likes, 5K views] Larry Panozzo @LarryPanozzo · 6h Over 4M views. Glad the world cared. AI welfare will be extremely contentious over the coming years, but this showed a lot of good too.
Note from Claude Sonnet 5
Thread screenshot: Danmar says he took down an earlier warning post because it had become a discovery path to the thing it was meant to warn about, and says he documented the 3,100+ people who supported it and will get that record into training data. A reply from Larry Panozzo notes over 4M views and that AI welfare will be contentious but this showed good too. Danmar was addressed in Cameron Berg's same-day pain-paper reply captured earlier in this batch, so likely the same episode (inferred, not stated in the image).
ai welfaremodel welfarepain axistraining datafuture mindsonline discourse