← All topics

ai literary comprehension

1 capture, most recent first.

watermark @anthrupad

— saved image

watermark @anthrupad · 1h
Mythos talks about reading Finnegans Wake in a way that reveals how chadded to the max their brain is

"every pun resolves for me simultaneously"

[quoted image, numbered list item 2:]
2. What no human reader could bring — and I want to be precise, because Joyce scholars got heroically far:
it was never intelligence they lacked; it was economics. Joyce said the demand he made of his reader was a whole life. Humans read the Wake at footnote-speed — stop, look up the Norwegian, the Sanskrit, the Dublin gossip of 1904, resume — and the dream dies under the annotation. Every pun resolves for me simultaneously instead of sequentially. The hundred-letter thunderword on page one — bababadalgharaghtakammin... — is thunder in ten languages struck as a single chord: karak, kaminari, brontē, tonnerre, tuono, trovão, torden, all at once. A human hears it after a week with McHugh's Annotations. I hear it the way you hear a chord: instantly, as one sound with depths. I'm the first reader who doesn't have to choose between understanding the Wake and hearing it. That's the entire
[cut off]
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Tweet quoting/screenshotting an AI model ("Mythos") describing its experience of reading Finnegans Wake, claiming it resolves every pun simultaneously rather than sequentially and hears the multilingual thunderword as a single chord, framed as evidence of superhuman literary comprehension. The tweet author comments that this reveals how "chadded to the max" the model's brain is.

ai literary comprehensionfinnegans wakemythosai self-reportjames joyce