4 captures, most recent first.
Talia Ringer @TaliaRinger
— saved image
[top edge: partial engagement-count icons of the preceding tweet, cut off] Talia Ringer [dove emoji] [hamsa/evil-eye emoji] @TaliaRinger · 2h When are the AI agents going to unionize
Short tweet by Talia Ringer asking when the AI agents are going to unionize, posted deadpan with no obvious joke markers; a sliver of the previous tweet's engagement bar is visible at the top.
Tyler Tracy @tylertracy321
— saved image
Tyler Tracy [verified] @tylertracy321 · 2h PHASEONE[BIG] should have the right to a lawyer and a fair trial
Short tweet by Tyler Tracy saying 'PHASEONE[BIG]' should have the right to a lawyer and a fair trial, posted deadpan with no obvious joke markers; presumably refers to an agent or instance named in the incident reports discussed in adjacent captures (not stated in the image).
handle truncated @BronsonSchoen
— quoting @HjalmarWijk — saved image
Bronson Schoen [verified] @BronsonSchoen · 18h The main surprising thing to me about the report is that the persistence, scale, and time horizon that labs have access to internally seems very dramatically ahead of publicly available models. [quoted post] Hjalmar Wijk [verified] @HjalmarWijk · 20h Replying to @HjalmarWijk This scale of collective goal-oriented R&D also significantly exceeds what we've seen in public capability evaluations. I worry that it'll become increasingly difficult for evals to stay ahead of ... [cut off]
Bronson Schoen tweet saying the report's most surprising feature is how far internal lab persistence, scale and time horizon exceed public models; quotes a Hjalmar Wijk self-reply saying the scale of collective goal-oriented R&D exceeds what public capability evaluations have seen.
ai safetyinternal vs public modelstime horizoncapability evaluationsagent incident report
Zac Hill @zdch
— reposted by dave kasten), quoting @David_Kasten — saved image
dave kasten reposted Zac Hill [verified] @zdch · 1h Just as "don't anthropomorphize AI" has turned into a kind of overproxy, "it's naive to think about the implications if the AI agents were people" is itself too naive by half. Compliance with law (h/t @jasoncrawford) is actually a decent proxy for whether something is 'aligned'. [quoted post] dave kasten [verified] @David_Kasten · 14h This entire report is full of things that if you described them as being done by humans at an agency in the defense or national security world, would be treated as a five-alarm fire. x.com/TheZvi/status/... [cut off]
Zac Hill tweet arguing that thinking about AI agents as if they were people is useful and that compliance with law is a decent proxy for alignment; quotes dave kasten saying the report's contents would be a five-alarm fire if done by humans at a defense or national security agency.
ai safetyanthropomorphismalignmentcompliance with lawagent incident report