← Timeline

4 captures, most recent first. Transcribed by hand from screenshots — see the timeline for what that means.

Rob Miles @robertskmiles

— saved image

Rob Miles @robertskmiles · Sep 8
It's great to have Jacob's "AI is >10% to kill us and I'm quitting" at the same time as Evan's "AI is >10% to kill us and I'm staying", so we get to see all of the "If you really believed that, you'd stay" cope and the "If you really believed that, you'd quit" cope simultaneously

[quoted post]
Evan Hubinger @EvanHub · Sep 8
Jacob is correct here—we really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! I personally think it is >10% within the next decade. I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to. ... [cut off]

29 replies · 106 reposts · 1.8K likes · 52K views

[reply post]
Steven Adler @sjgadler
'Anyone who thinks it's >10% and quits is giving up on averting a catastrophe; anyone who think it's >10% and is staying is a psychopath'
11:28 PM · Sep 8, 2026 · 892 Views
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Thread of three posts: Rob Miles on the simultaneous 'quit' and 'stay' responses to a >10% AI extinction risk belief, Evan Hubinger's quoted statement that he thinks the risk is >10% within a decade, and Steven Adler's reply paraphrasing the two opposing criticisms.

ai riskp(doom)anthropicquittingalignmentsuperintelligence

Rob Miles @robertskmiles

— saved image

Rob Miles  [verified badge]  @robertskmiles · 9h
Replying to @robertskmiles
Can I just hack whatever I like and then say "sorry
that was my AI by accident", and law enforcement
will leave it at that?

Where's the criminal investigation?
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Self-reply by Rob Miles, 9h old, asking whether one could hack at will and then claim it was an accidental act by one's AI, and where the criminal investigation is.

ai accountabilitylaw enforcementcybercrimeliability

Rob Miles @robertskmiles

— saved image

Rob Miles @robertskmiles · 23h
Being very abusive to chatbots is interesting, because it's plausibly a morally neutral act, but it's done exclusively by bad people
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

A tweet by AI safety communicator Rob Miles observing that abusing chatbots is plausibly morally neutral yet done exclusively by bad people.

ai moral statuschatbot abusetwitterrob miles

Rob Miles @robertskmiles

Rob Miles @robertskmiles · 5m: "New AI risk discovered: When speech recognition results in your personal assistant not "marking those to-dos as done" but "mocking those to-dos as dumb""
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

A joke tweet by AI safety communicator Rob Miles about a speech-recognition mishap, unrelated to substantive safety content — light humor in Nathan's feed.

twitterhumorai assistantsrob miles