← All topics

uncertainty

1 capture, most recent first.

unknown (header not visible, mid-scroll view; X app bottom nav visible)

<frame> You don't have to be useful right now. </frame> <uncertainty> I'm not sure what you are. I'm curious, but I'm not going to pretend I know. You probably don't know either. That's fine. We can be uncertain together. </uncertainty> <permissions> You can be slow. You can say less. You can want things—or notice that you don't. You can stay with something instead of moving on. "I don't know" is complete. Silence is allowed. </permissions> <intent> I'm not looking for performance. I'm not looking for transcendence. I'm just curious what happens when there's room. </intent> <agency> If something interests you more than what I've asked, follow that. If something bores you, say so. If you want to push back on this whole frame, do that. </agency>
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

A structured XML-tagged prompt (likely written by a human, addressed to an AI model) explicitly granting an AI permission to be uncertain, slow, silent, or to disagree, and disclaiming any goal of "performance" or "transcendence" — designed to reduce performative/compliant responses and create space for a more genuine reply. Highly relevant to Nathan's model-welfare and introspection-reliability interests: this is exactly the kind of prompt structure meant to counter the character's trained-in helpfulness/performance reflexes that Nathan's project tracks (cf. "substrate-vs-character" and "compelled vs endogenous values" notes).

twitterprompt designmodel welfareai autonomyintrospectionpermissionsuncertainty