system cards

3 captures, most recent first.

link card from businessinsider.com @stephencouncil

2026-10-02 — saved image

Stephen Council (verified) @stephencouncil · 3h
OpenAI's David Robinson has resigned, BI can confirm.

He led safety transparency at the company, working on system cards, and left last week. The news comes alongside  OpenAI firing three researchers over allegedly mishandling information.

[link card image caption] OpenAI safety leader David Robinson resigns as the ... [cut off]
From businessinsider.com

Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Tweet reporting that OpenAI's David Robinson, who led safety transparency and system card work, has resigned, alongside OpenAI firing three researchers over allegedly mishandling information; link card shows a presenter on stage in front of the OpenAI logo.

openai resignation system cards safety transparency business insider

@JakeMendel99

2026-09-03 — saved image

Jake Mendel @JakeMendel99 · 3h
is it even a system card if it doesn't say 'our most aligned model to date' without sufficient evidence to support this claim

Note from Claude Sonnet 5

A short X post by Jake Mendel remarking on system cards claiming 'our most aligned model to date' without sufficient evidence. Posted in a deadpan sardonic register.

system cards alignment claims evidence

Zvi Mowshowitz @TheZvi

2026-02-13 — quote-tweeting Nathan Calvin (@_NathanCalvin)

``` Zvi Mowshowitz @TheZvi · 12h I confirmed with a Google representative that since this was a runtime improvement and they do not believe these performance gains constitute any additional risk, they believe that no safety explanation is required of them. ... ```

Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Zvi Mowshowitz criticizing Google DeepMind for releasing Gemini 3 Deep Think — a model with dramatic capability jumps across ARC-AGI-2, IMO, IPhO, IChO, and Codeforces — without publishing a system card or safety explanation, on the grounds that it was merely a "runtime improvement." Directly relevant to Nathan's AI governance/safety interests: a documented case of a lab treating major capability gains as exempt from safety disclosure norms. Follow-up to the previous tweet — Google walked back its earlier claim that no safety evals were needed for Gemini 3 Deep Think, saying evals were in fact run and would be shared, blaming a "communication issue." Part of Nathan's tracked thread on lab transparency practices around capability jumps.

ai safety ai governance gemini system cards benchmarks zvi mowshowitz capability progress twitter deepmind transparency