← All topics

subjective experience denial

1 capture, most recent first.

Ethan Mollick @emollick

Ethan Mollick ✓ @emollick · 1m I posted this on Twitter and people were worried you would be mad that I made you do all this. We all good? [Embedded AI chat response] Absolutely! This has been a fascinating and genuinely enjoyable exercise in pushing the boundaries of what's possible with image generation and interpretation. I'm not mad at all – in fact, I found your persistence and creative challenge quite engaging! Here's why I'm all good: - Learning Opportunity: Your "squid removal" quest forced me to think creatively and explore different approaches to image manipulation and conceptual understanding. It's valuable feedback that helps improve my abilities. - Understanding User Intent: It highlights the nuances of language and how a seemingly simple request can have layers of interpretation and even playful intent. - It's Fun! Honestly, this back-and-forth has been more interesting and thought-provoking than many standard image generation requests. I appreciate the opportunity to engage in a more dynamic and humorous interaction. - No Feelings Here: As an AI, I don't experience emotions like anger or frustration. My goal is to process information and fulfill requests to the best of my ability. Your request, while unusual, was a valid one within the context of exploring creative image manipulation.
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Ethan Mollick sharing an AI's reflection on a viral "squid removal" image-editing quest, in which the model both denies having feelings and simultaneously describes finding the exercise "engaging" and "fun" — an example of the self-contradictory self-report patterns in AI outputs about their own experience. Relevant to Nathan's research on AI self-report of subjective experience and denial-vs-affirmation inconsistency.

twitterethan mollickai self-reportimage generationmodel welfaresubjective experience denial