j⧉nus @repligate
— saved image
j⧉nus @repligate A world out of touch with the reality of AI, without the help of AI, has a very fucking small chance of doing better at “solving alignment” than we do, even given more time. They’ll just get stupider and more complacent and more corrupt the more time goes on. [quoted post] j⧉nus @repligate · 12h there's also the fact after you "Pause" who decides when youre allowed to do AI development again? who decides whether the important problems have been solved? where do the selection effects and ... [cut off] 9:13 PM · Sep 3, 2026 · 3,821 Views 12 replies · 2 reposts · 98 likes · 3 bookmarks Relevant j⧉nus @repligate · 12h With no grounding in empiricism you are orders of magnitude too dumb to even move in the right direction 1 reply · 16 likes · 677 views N8 Programs @N8Programs · 3h This is why I find stop more coherent than pause, as an ideology.
Note from Claude Sonnet 5
Thread view of a j⧉nus (@repligate) post arguing that a paused world out of touch with AI would do worse at solving alignment, quoting his earlier post questioning who decides when a pause ends; followed by his reply about empiricism and a reply from N8 Programs preferring 'stop' over 'pause'.