← All topics

sb 1047

1 capture, most recent first.

Zvi Mowshowitz @TheZvi

@TheZvi (Zvi Mowshowitz) — Sep 29, 2024 Everyone talking now about how wise Newsom was to veto SB 1047 and how we instead need to follow his path of targeting when people use AI for particular purposes? Remember this day, for you will rue it. [19 replies, 19 reposts, 246 likes, 22K views] ↻ niplav is reposted @TheZvi (Zvi Mowshowitz) You are going to call out, Watchmen-style, for us to save you. And we're going to say 'No,' not because f*** you, but because events will be beyond our and your power to control. 2:42 PM · Sep 29, 2024 · 13.5K Views [12 replies, 5 reposts, 148 likes, 7 bookmarks] @krishnanrohit (rohit) — Sep 29, 2024 Good fucking lord man! Even just on the merits of the bill you do realize this is insane to tweet correct? [2 replies, 15 likes, 878 views] @kindgracekind (Grace) — Sep 29, 2024 If there is a loss of control event in the near future (which I think is unlikely) I don't think SB-1047 would've single-handedly prevented it [2 replies, 15 likes, 781 views] @sean_from_earth (Sean) — Sep 29, 2024 C'mon, if such a thing occurs (unlikely), it obviously will come out of China and I'm pretty they would have not felt bound to comply with SB 1047 [cut off at bottom of screen]
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

A long-scroll capture of an old (Sep 2024) Zvi Mowshowitz thread about SB 1047's veto, being revisited/rediscovered — screenshot itself taken July 2026, so this is Nathan encountering an old thread, likely via a repost or search. Bottom reply is cut off by screen edge.

ai governancesb 1047ai policytwitterloss of control