← All topics

sample efficiency

2 captures, most recent first.

Rishabh Agarwal @agarwl_

quoting @dwarkesh_sp (Dwarkesh Patel)

Rishabh Agarwal (@agarwl_) — 2h Problems we care about are often very slow verification loops (e.g, automating pretraining, making a new material)-- either you find a good enough proxy (e.g, simulator, grindable env) or unlock how to deal with this slowness (e.g, very sample efficient RL), which would be a step change. > QUOTED: Dwarkesh Patel (@dwarkesh_sp) — Jun 26 > Here's a question I find confusing and interesting and which actually tells us a lot about the nature of current AI progress: > Why has progress on computer use been so ... [truncated by platform]
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Text-only quote-tweet chain discussing AI research/RL methodology, no images. Dwarkesh's tweet is cut off by platform truncation ("...").

ai researchreinforcement learningsample efficiencytwitter

@sang_yun_lee

quote-tweeting @dwarkesh_sp (Dwarkesh Patel)

@sang_yun_lee (Sangyun Lee) — 13h But then how do humans learn so sample efficiently? The path is clear if you are willing to believe a hypothesis: the brain is just a gigantic recurrent neural network that rewires its own weights during the forward pass > QUOTED: @dwarkesh_sp (Dwarkesh Patel) — 20h > Here's a question I find confusing and interesting and which actually tells us a lot about the nature of current AI progress: > Why has progress on computer use been so ... [truncated]
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Quote-tweet chain discussing sample efficiency of human learning versus AI, and computer-use agent progress; quoted tweet cut off by platform truncation.

neurosciencemachine learningsample efficiencycomputer use agents