— reply from @FJSchreiber — saved image
Anthony Leverrier @letonyo Is this happening a lot: you interact with chatGPT to solve an interesting (TCS/math) question; after 50 prompts, you get some midly interesting result (that would have been a good paper not long ago) and a 50-page page written by the AI. But then, you're too tired (1/2) 7:51 AM · Sep 18, 2026 · 13.5K Views 7 replies · 13 reposts · 92 likes · 25 bookmarks Relevant · View quotes Anthony Leverrier @letonyo · 2h to check it all, and to rewrite it in a clear way. So you just let it there on your computer. This has happened to me quite a bit, and i guess I'm not the only one. 7 replies · 4 reposts · 64 likes · 3K views Franz Schreiber @FJSchreiber · 10m I gues like with all the shiny gadgets of modern society, it requires discipline. (That being said, I can relate) 1 reply · 2 likes · 245 views Anthony Leverrier @letonyo · 7m it's just that the effort for having the finished product you can put on the arxiv is vastly larger than the one to get the result together with a full AI-generated paper. And the current incentives for publishing new results are not that high anymore, unless it's a breakthrough [cut off]
Note from Claude Sonnet 5
Thread by Anthony Leverrier about getting a mildly interesting TCS/math result and a 50-page AI-written draft from ChatGPT and then lacking the energy to verify and rewrite it for arXiv, with a reply from Franz Schreiber and Leverrier's follow-up about weak incentives for publishing new results.
ai for mathresearch workflowarxivpublishing incentiveschatgpttheoretical computer science