Sholto David @addictedtoigno1
— saved image
Sholto David @addictedtoigno1 · Aug 6 A tool used to rephrase plagiarised text changed "final solution" to "mass killing of an ethnic group" in a chemistry paper. Now retracted thanks to a PubPeer user who spotted this. [quoted paper excerpt, image] 2.3.4. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) To judge protein-inferred oxidative damage, a soil test was administered. A phosphate safeguard answer was used to regulate the pH to 7.8, influencing the total response book to 30 mL. The backlash combination was able by joining 1.75 mL of Triton, 1.5 mL of methionine, and 1 mL of NBT. Subsequently, 1 mL of the mass killing of an ethnic group was opposed to 20 mL of the skin sample and unprotected to light for 7 min. Following development at 37 °C for 5 min, 10 mL of riboflavin solution was brought in. The resolutions were before claimed at 40 °C for 8–10 min [39]. The mechanism of activity explore the SOD with oxidative stress is shown in Fig. 3. Absorbance calculations were acquired utilizing German Zellbio supplies, accompanying three readings averaging each
Note from Claude Sonnet 5
Tweet showing a chemistry paper passage mangled by an AI paraphrasing/plagiarism-evasion tool: the phrase 'final solution' (a standard chemistry term, i.e. the reagent solution added last) was rewritten as 'mass killing of an ethnic group', and other jargon nonsensically substituted ('phosphate safeguard answer' for buffer, etc). Highlighted in yellow and blue in a screenshot of the paper excerpt.