Danielle Fong @DanielleFong
— quoting @chris_j_paxton — saved image
Danielle Fong 🐦☀️ ✅ @DanielleFong · 2h i think it's a fair hit that for years and decades you basically weren't allowed to analyze these more complex realistic scenarios in yuddite contexts. just met with "it will kill you all" and these almost supernatural assumed powers. that's not taking the limit correctly [Quoted] Chris Paxton ✅ @chris_j_paxton · 9h I think this is pretty consistent with the "paperclip maximizer" failure mode to be fair to Eliezer; the idea that itll be too smart to be controlled but not understand the consequences of items actions and cause ...
Note from Claude Sonnet 5
X thread critiquing AI doom discourse: Danielle Fong argues 'Yuddite' (Yudkowsky-style) AI risk framing dismisses complex realistic scenarios in favor of 'it will kill you all' with near-supernatural assumed powers, calling this 'not taking the limit correctly.' Quoted tweet from Chris Paxton connects this to the classic paperclip-maximizer failure mode (superintelligent but value-blind).