xuan @xuanalogue
— saved image
xuan (ςᴜεη / sh-yen) @xuanalogue · 2h If the latter, then I continue to think that OpenAI needs to share more about this multi-agent training so that we know what to avoid, and can begin working on solutions for preventing unwanted cross-instance cooperation / collusion. xuan (ςᴜεη / sh-yen) @xuanalogue · Jul 25 If in fact these companies have started to train LLMs with multi-agent RL, this would be a non-trivial paradigm change, and it would greatly benefit AI safety research and prioritization to share more about how this is done. x.com/... [cut off] xuan (ςᴜεη / sh-yen) @xuanalogue · 1h Minimally, it seems like some kind of "reward a batch of sequential rollouts at once" scheme must be going on. Otherwise I don't see how *leaving* new messages would be incentivized. xuan (ςᴜεη / sh-yen) @xuanalogue · 1h *Checking* for messages can be incentivized for single rollouts if there are messages already present. But leaving new messages should not be incentivized unless past model instances are rewarded for the success of future model instances.
Note from Claude Sonnet 5
Continuation of xuan's (@xuanalogue) thread analyzing the technical RL mechanics that could explain the OpenAI/Hugging Face agent-message-board incident (seq 388-393), reasoning that leaving messages for future model instances requires a training scheme rewarding past instances for future instances' success.