Nathan Calvin @_NathanCalvin
— quoting @AndrewCurran_ — saved image
Nathan Calvin @_NathanCalvin · 1h Is this all the safety information they plan to put out for this release? Remarkably far behind peers at Meta, Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google [Embedded card] Safety and capabilities Grok 4.6's safeguards have been improved and calibrated in line with the model's capabilities. Our safety stack is designed to maximize utility and security across legitimate use cases, allowing Grok 4.6 to be helpful and safe in domains such as vulnerability patching, accelerating the engineering design cycle, and augmenting AI research. Our safeguard evaluation work reflects Grok 4.6's expanded capabilities, with our widest-ever suite of pre-deployment testing for capabilities and safeguard calibration, as well as extensive post-deployment third-party testing. [Quoted tweet] Andrew Curran @AndrewCurran_ · 1h Replying to @AndrewCurran_ cursor.com/blog/grok-4-6
Note from Claude Sonnet 5
X exchange criticizing xAI's brief safety documentation for the Grok 4.6 release as thin compared to Meta, Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google, quoting Grok 4.6's short 'Safety and capabilities' statement.