Simon Hedlin @simonhedlin
— saved image
Simon Hedlin (verified) @simonhedlin · 6h In the cases people are talking about now, nobody bought the chainsaw. The chainsaw escaped the factory before it was sold and then it exploded, and the main federal statute imposing liability for exploding chainsaws requires that a person intended for the chainsaw to explode. [quoted post] Isaac King [magnifying glass emoji] @IsaacKing314 · Sep 25 I am confused why there's a debate over how liability for AI hacks should work. If I buy a chainsaw and it explodes, the manufacturer is liable for building a faulty product. If I buy a chainsaw and use it to kill someone, the manufacturer is not liable for failing to build in [cut off]
Note from Claude Sonnet 5
Quote-tweet by Simon Hedlin (@simonhedlin) extending a chainsaw analogy for AI-hack liability, quoting Isaac King (@IsaacKing314); the quoted text is cropped mid-sentence.