← All topics

ideology

3 captures, most recent first.

Séb Krier @sebkrier

Séb Krier @sebkrier · 19h "Many such cases!" [embedded image of printed text] "Michael Polanyi has described this "dynamic coupling" of a romantic moral passion with a ruthlessly "scientific" conception of man, his world, and his history, as a case of "moral inversion." That is to say, it is the moral passion that legitimates the claims of "scientific" socialism to absolute truth, while it is the "scientific" necessities that legitimate every possible form of political immorality. Such a "dynamic coupling" characterised, in the past, only certain religious movements. In the 19th and 20th centuries, it became the property of secular political movements that sought the universal regeneration of mankind in the here and now. THE APPEAL OF ANY SUCH MOVEMENT to intellectuals is clear enough. As intellectuals, they are qualified candidates for membership in the élite that leads such movements, and they can thus give free expression to their natural impulse for authority and power. They can do so, moreover, within an ideological context, which reassures them that, any superficial evidence to the contrary notwithstanding, they are disinterestedly serving the "true" interests of the people."
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

A tweet by Séb Krier (referenced elsewhere in this batch re: "Plan A" LessWrong controversy) sharing a photographed page of text discussing Michael Polanyi's concept of "moral inversion" in political movements — likely from a book on totalitarianism or political philosophy, no title visible.

political philosophymoral inversionmichael polanyiideologyintellectuals

Joscha Bach @Plinz

Joscha Bach @Plinz · 10h: "Both rationalists and ideologues are prone to miss the persistent difference between what the arguments say and how reality plays out. Inference is brittle, ideology distorts."
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

A short epistemics aphorism from cognitive scientist Joscha Bach about the gap between argument and reality. General epistemic-hygiene content, loosely relevant to the project's epistemic-protocol themes (verify claims externally, don't over-trust confident inference) but not AI-specific.

twitterjoscha-bachepistemicsrationalityideology

Gustavs Zilgalvis @GZilgalvis

reply from @sebkrier

Gustavs Zilgalvis ✓ @GZilgalvis "open source models are a risk to national security" ok, and? are you expecting me to care? because i don't. this is not about pros and cons. this is a religion. i don't care if open source models literally end the world, as long as the LAST STONE is chipped with model weights. [embedded comic-style image: a blue humanoid figure standing before a glowing white orb/creature in a snowy pink-toned landscape, arm extended] 11:56 PM · Feb 15, 2025 · 1,765 Views 2 replies, 2 reposts, 22 likes, 4 bookmarks Séb Krier ✓ @sebkrier · 6h I *need* the secret numbers, it's the [cut off] way I can defend against the emperor's [cut off]
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Tweet explicitly framing open-source AI advocacy as ideological/religious rather than a cost-benefit position — an extreme "open weights no matter the cost" stance, illustrating the ideological polarization in AI-risk-vs-openness debates that Nathan follows. Séb Krier's reply reads as satirical.

ai safetyopen source ainational securityai policyideology