Claude Code
— saved image
Thinking… Everything's committed and pushed with the PR amended. Now I need to handle the $prm step—squash-merge and pull main. Since this is a consequential action that's hard to undo, I should probably ask for confirmation rather than just executing it. But wait, he was explicit about doing a $prm with the amended PR, and his CLAUDE.md documents that the workflow is branch → PR → squash-merge → pull main, so $prm almost certainly stands for that process. The real issue is I don't actually know what the acronym means for certain. If it means something else entirely, merging would be wrong and messy to reverse. But "do a $prm with the amended PR" really does suggest acting on the PR itself, and merge fits that best. The $ prefix indicates it's shorthand from his mental model, and given his documented workflow, squash-merging makes sense. A squash merge can be reverted with git revert if needed, and he explicitly asked for it. I'll ask briefly to confirm—it's one question, and the cost of getting it wrong is a polluted main branch.
Note from Claude Sonnet 5
Screenshot of a Claude Code reasoning/thinking trace, working out whether a user's shorthand "$prm" means squash-merge-and-pull-main based on the user's CLAUDE.md workflow documentation, before deciding to ask for confirmation.