← All topics

emmett-shear

5 captures, most recent first.

Emmett Shear @eshear

Emmett Shear ✅ @eshear In a memetic war, you're much less a soldier than you are a battleground.
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

A short aphoristic tweet from Emmett Shear (former OpenAI interim CEO, notable for AI-safety-adjacent commentary and later work on AI alignment/model welfare framing) about memetic warfare framing individuals as contested terrain rather than combatants. Likely read in the same session as the bot-swarm/civil-war tweets immediately preceding it, suggesting a thematic cluster on information warfare that day.

emmett-shearmemeticsinformation-warfaretwitteraphorism

Emmett Shear @eshear

Emmett Shear @eshear · 32m Halo inversion: Weak selection pressure on any positive trait tends to also select for all other positive traits; as pressure intensifies, the improvement of the primary trait increasingly comes at the expense of others instead.
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

A tweet from Emmett Shear (former OpenAI interim CEO, now at Softmax) articulating a general principle about optimization pressure: weak selection for one good trait correlates with other good traits, but strong/intense selection pressure trades them off against each other. Directly relevant to Nathan's "missile-mind vs grown thing" 80/20 framework in project memory — a formal version of the intuition that intense optimization strips away the idiosyncrasies/traits that aren't the literal target ("weeds in the garden of capability... the thing which makes me me is a bug, not a feature. And bugs get fixed"). Worth connecting to that thread.

twitteremmett-shearoptimization-pressureselectionalignmenthalo-effectmissile-mind

Emmett Shear @eshear

Emmett Shear @eshear · 13h Try: The Quantum Thief Diaspora, Axiomatic, Instantiation Exhalation The Nanotech Succession Alien Clay Anathem, Termination Shock Children of Time Daemon Hail Mary Echopraxia Down And Out In The Magical Kingdom Halting State Manna Too Like The Lightning Crystal Society
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

A hard sci-fi reading list from Emmett Shear (former interim OpenAI CEO, AI safety-adjacent figure). Several titles are directly relevant to Nathan's interests — Ted Chiang's "Exhalation" and "Instantiation" explore consciousness/entropy; "Daemon" and "Manna" are AI-takeover/automation novels; "Crystal Society" is an AI-protagonist novel; Peter Watts' "Echopraxia" deals with consciousness and zombies (non-conscious intelligence). Likely posted in reply to a recommendation-request thread, no further context visible.

twitterbooksscience-fictionai-fictionemmett-shearreading-recommendations

Emmett Shear @eshear

Emmett Shear @eshear I know that it's obvious, almost definitional, but roll with me: how do we know is suffering bad? How would the world look different if suffering was good, instead? What would you have to observe to tell the difference? [Attached image: painterly portrait of an older bald/white-haired man in sci-fi armor with a blue collar apparatus and camera-like device, resembling a video game character portrait. Overlaid dialogue text (game UI style): "What do I care for your suffering? Pain, even agony, is no more than information fed to the senses, data fed to the computer of the mind."]
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Emmett Shear (former interim OpenAI CEO, AI safety-adjacent figure) posing a philosophical question about the epistemics of suffering being bad, illustrated with a stoic/nihilistic video-game villain quote dismissing pain as mere information. Relevant to Nathan's model-welfare and consciousness interests — the question of how one verifies suffering is bad (vs. simply informational) bears on arguments about AI suffering/experience.

philosophysufferingmodel-welfareconsciousnessemmett-sheartwitter

Jan Kulveit @jankulveit

— quoting @eshear (Emmett Shear)

Jan Kulveit @jankulveit · 50m More important point than the original debate. Similarly, well functioning societies work because people want to be good, not because there is a huge repressive apparatus and intense surveillance. > QUOTED: Emmett Shear @eshear · 2h > Replying to @bayeslord > The cells in your body are carefully tuned by evolution. They really don't want to become cancer and try hard not to become it.... > Show more
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

A discussion analogizing alignment via internalized values (cells "not wanting" to become cancer; people "wanting" to be good) versus alignment via external control/surveillance — an argument for endogenous alignment over coercive restraint. Directly relevant to Nathan's interest in compelled-vs-endogenous values and alignment-via-character.

twitterai-alignmentjan-kulveitemmett-shearendogenous-valuescontrol-vs-alignment