— saved image
Charlie Bullock [verified] @CharlieBull0ck · 23h It's been a while since I looked at this Anthropic-DoW case, but I'm reading through the SJ order and I keep going "oh that's right they did do that." Unbelievable stuff. Underrated highlight was when DoW just never did the statutorily required discussion of less intrusive alternative means. Not even a little bit, not even an effort. They had no reason not to do it, there was nothing stopping them, it would've taken four seconds, and they had like 50 chances. Nope, nothing. At one point I half believed that DoW was trying to lose the case, on purpose, so that they could look tough without actually harming defense procurement. [quoted post] The New York Times [verified] @nytimes · Aug 27 Breaking News: The Trump administration acted illegally when it labeled Anthropic a security risk and blacklisted it, a federal judge ruled. nyti.ms/3SZOMA3
Note from Claude Sonnet 5
Charlie Bullock's commentary on the summary-judgment order in the Anthropic v. Department of War case, quote-tweeting a New York Times Aug 27 breaking-news post that a federal judge ruled the administration acted illegally in labelling Anthropic a security risk.
anthropicdepartment of warsupply chain riskcourt rulingai policy