— reply thread: @macintogdev, @ZackKorman, @AssafPetronio, @kaclk, @hm_tech_travel — saved image
macintog [verified] @macintogdev · 1h I'm sure they're all working very hard and are very stressed and everyone thinks they're very smart, and I don't even begrudge them the chance at generational wealth. But their task is absolutely no- fail, and their professional results are unprofessional. My post struck a nerve. [11 likes · 102 views] Zack Korman [verified] @ZackKorman · 12m "it doesn't matter if it was due to company culture. Safety culture is pivotal to safety-critical systems for a reason, and blaming it on culture doesn't make it any less negligent" I fully agree with this [6 likes · 27 views] Assaf Petronio [verified] @AssafPetronio · 1h culture explains how a gap survived review. it doesn't make the gap less real [1 like · 38 views] Kayle Clark [Canadian flag] @kaclk · 1h Could you imagine if a construction company blamed "culture" if people kept dying on a building site? The AI companies are completely immature. They think they can operate devoid of consequences because what they do is "important". [3 likes · 43 views] Hannah Genie @hm_tech_travel · 1h Agreed. Acknowledging an alert in 3 minutes but stopping the run 2.5 hours later is a controls failure, period. I've sat through audits where that gets written up as a major finding. Culture or not. [cut off at bottom of screen]
Note from Claude Sonnet 5
Scrolled X reply thread of five posts reacting to an OpenAI engineer's post about an incident, arguing that blaming company culture does not excuse negligence and that AI companies lack safety-critical-systems discipline. A floating compose button overlaps the last reply.
openaiai incidentsafety culturenegligencecontrols failureai companies