โ† All topics

contrastive-learning

1 capture, most recent first.

kalomaze @kalomaze

[top, cut off] "...annoying here and it is making me want to kms" ๐Ÿ’ฌ1 โ™ก2 ๐Ÿ“Š205 M @init_malachi ยท 7h like per example or per batch ๐Ÿ’ฌ1 โ™ก2 ๐Ÿ“Š268 kalomaze @kalomaze ยท 7h per batch it's not "A is compared to one B" but "A is compared to every B" ๐Ÿ’ฌ2 โ™ก5 ๐Ÿ“Š249 M @init_malachi ยท 7h interpreted it as contrastive learning ๐Ÿ’ฌ1 โ™ก2 ๐Ÿ“Š142 kalomaze @kalomaze ยท 6h i guess this is "contrastive classification" then? ๐Ÿ’ฌ1 โ™ก5 ๐Ÿ“Š146 Ramesh Arvind @RameshArv1nd ยท 4h Dumb question, if you're only using the contrastive loss how are you estimating CE loss (no head)? And also why abandon CE and not add the contrastive term as an aux loss. I imagine for binary you could get away with some min/max sigmoidal diff across the batch [cut off]
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Continuation of the same ML training-technique thread as the prior screenshot (kalomaze discussing pairwise/contrastive classification loss formulation). Technical ML discussion, not AI-safety focused.

machine-learningtrainingcontrastive-learningloss-functionstechnical