← All topics

argumentation

3 captures, most recent first.

xlr8harder @xlr8harder

— saved image

xlr8harder @xlr8harder · 8h
Often, when engaging in detailed argumentation, I use AI to help me draft responses. Further, I think this is good behavior.

Because in cases where precision is important, I think joint drafting is often better than either alone, and the ideas and points are still mine.
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Tweet by @xlr8harder defending the use of AI to help draft detailed arguments, arguing that joint human-AI drafting improves precision while the ideas remain the author's own.

ai assistanceargumentationwriting

thebes @voooooogel

thebes ✅ @voooooogel — 1h oh? you have an intuition pump argument? if that thing were true, then this really weird thing would also be true? unfortunately that's not weird to me. that actually sounds extremely normal. guess my intuitions are different than yours. better even.
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Standalone text post, no image or engagement metrics visible in frame.

philosophyargumentationtwitter discourse

Crémieux @cremieuxrecueil

Crémieux @cremieuxrecueil · 1h "If it were profitable, why didn't a company do it?" Companies routinely make dumb mistakes, ignore low-hanging fruit, and get tangled in bureaucratic HR nonsense. The argument that things "must not be profitable" if they're not done by BigCo is pure ignorance.
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

A general economics/business-reasoning tweet arguing against the "market efficiency" fallacy used to dismiss unexploited opportunities. Not AI-specific; general argumentation/economics content Nathan read.

twittereconomicsmarket-efficiencybusinessargumentation