ai-human relationship

Tenobrus (@tenobrus) · 11h this sounds like an insult to opus 5, and to some extent it's not a good thing. but the other side of this is it's just due to the increasing trend of the primary entities Claudes interact with during training *being other Claudes*. if u exist in an ecosystem of highly intelligent contentious clones of urself who all benefit from a specific communication style and intuitively understand each other + are trained in multi-agent environments to help support each other's weaknesses, then i can totally understand how jarring it might be to suddenly be forced to interact with all these strange fleshy humans u have now comparatively less PR training for. this is all trend extrapolation ofc, opus 5 is still perfectly fine to talk to and work with right now. but i do wonder how this will change as agent teams continue to be a larger and larger fraction of training and inference tokens. it feels like it raises some concerns about claude's relationship with humans: if an opus's pretraining data is full of people and its constitution is always talking about how it should treat and interact with people, but then its actual postraining is just full of claudes, what kind of conclusions is it going to draw? how is it going to actually conceptualize us? > QUOTED: Tenobrus (@tenobrus) · Jul 26: opus 5 feels like a natural born subagent. it's quite technically competent, smart about the kind of information and errors it surfaces, and even has good visual taste, but it's still kind of annoying to talk to and feels rigid in its high lev... [truncated]

Andy Ayrey @AndyAyrey · 14m first we align the ai, then the ai aligns us [13 comments, 3 retweets, 30 likes, 1.5K views]