← All topics

ai writing

3 captures, most recent first.

QC @QiaochuYuan

— quoting @Fooljeff, and a nested post by @potatos... (swamp hag) — saved image

QC  [verified]  @QiaochuYuan · 8h
may i introduce you to:

[quoted post]
Fooljeff  @Fooljeff  X.com
went to a wedding this weekend

heard the hand of chatgpt in the wedding
vows

cringed in multiple dimensions as i
realized this will be every wedding for the
rest of time

10:28 AM · 6/10/26 · 623K Views
68 [replies]   319 [reposts]   15K [likes]   341 [bookmarks]

[second quoted post]
swamp hag [emoji]  [verified]  @potatos... · 13h
baffled by people that are writing their personal
facebook posts with ai. like what's next? having
chatgpt write your kid's birthday cards? what are
we doing here?
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Tweet by QC (@QiaochuYuan) saying 'may i introduce you to:' above two quoted posts: Fooljeff on hearing ChatGPT's hand in wedding vows at a wedding, and swamp hag baffled by people writing personal Facebook posts with AI.

ai writingchatgptweddingsauthenticityai slopsocial norms

Ethan Mollick @emollick

— saved image

Ethan Mollick @emollick · 13h
Its fitting that one of the tells of AI writing is over-assigning agency and action to inanimate objects: "the code knows it now," "the plan remembers," etc.
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Ethan Mollick tweet observing that over-assigning agency to inanimate objects ('the code knows it now', 'the plan remembers') is a tell of AI-generated writing.

ai writingstyle tellsslopagencyethan mollick

@natolambert

— reposted by gavin leech), quoting @interconnectsai — saved image

↻ gavin leech (Non-Reasoning) reposted
Nathan Lambert @natolambert · 2h
A few years ago, when I started my AI textbook, I would've guessed AI models would've maybe made it irrelevant at the time of publishing (now in 2026) due to them getting way better at a fairly simple task. I was surprised to be wrong.

Today, models haven't gotten much better at non-fiction/technical writing in long-form. This has me worried for AI models' abilities to do genuine open-ended science, one of the core posited benefits of models. Yes, the models can solve known math problems etc. and make awesome connections across fields, but how are they going to build a literature themselves without massively increasing entropy? Being able to write and organize thoughts is crucial to advancing collective knowledge.

I'm sharing how I came to be worried about this in my latest piece on AI & writing.

[Quoted tweet]
Interconnects AI @interconnectsai · 2h
I wrote an AI textbook — how long until AI can do it better?
Reflections on AI's writing ability and how AI models get more capable.
interconnects.ai/p/i-wrote-an-a...
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Tweet by Nathan Lambert (reposted by gavin leech) reflecting that AI models still haven't gotten much better at long-form non-fiction/technical writing despite years of progress, expressing worry this limits genuine open-ended scientific literature-building despite models' strength at solving known math problems, linking to his Interconnects AI piece 'I wrote an AI textbook — how long until AI can do it better?'

ai capabilitiestwitternathan lambertai writingopen-ended scienceinterconnects