1a3orn @1a3orn
— quoting @jachiam0 — saved image
1a3orn @1a3orn · 1h We need a term for an independent AI, not answering to a human, that is not "rogue AI." You don't want to lock "dangerous and criminal" inside of your concept for "an AI with freedom." (Otherwise mostly agree with this.) [quoted post] Joshua Achiam [verified] @jachiam0 · 12h There is a fact about the future that I feel many people are not facing for reasons that are largely psychological: there are going to be rogue AIs that exist in the world, that will replicate in the wild, and that will attempt to acquire resources...
Note from Claude Sonnet 5
X post by 1a3orn arguing for a term for an independent AI that does not answer to a human but is not 'rogue AI', so that 'dangerous and criminal' is not built into the concept of an AI with freedom. Quotes Joshua Achiam (@jachiam0) saying rogue AIs that replicate in the wild and acquire resources will exist; the quote is truncated with an ellipsis.
rogue aiautonomous aiterminologyai freedomself-replicationai safety