— saved image
Christopher Potts ✔️ @ChrisGPotts · 12m Every successful scientific project eventually enters a battle-testing phase in which the team is actively trying to show that their results don't hold. In a new post, @mmooritz and I describe how to ensure that this key process flourishes in an era of agentic science. 1 reply, 20 bookmarks/views icon, 1 like Christopher Potts ✔️ @ChrisGPotts · 12m Our method adapts adversarial coding review by fresh-context agents to the scientific process. The key change is to shift from "find all the bugs" to "what could manufacture this result?"
Note from Claude Sonnet 5
Tweet thread from Christopher Potts (with @mmooritz) introducing a method for adversarial 'battle-testing' of scientific results using fresh-context AI agents, reframing code review from bug-finding to asking what could have manufactured a given result.