CuddlySalmon @nptacek
— reply from Nathan Helm-Burger @nathan84686947 — saved image
CuddlySalmon @nptacek · 3h are any of the lw/AI safety crowd engaging with the reality that these recent cybersecurity incidents involving AI models are largely downstream from basic, day one mistakes in agentic scaffolding? like, shouldn't they be specifically calling out bad practices here? 2 [retweet] 1 ♥ 8 173 [bookmark] [share] Nathan Helm-Burger @nathan84686947 We are, yes. There are deep divides within even the companies themselves between the hands-clean no-prod-code people who carefully describe what a wise plan of action would be, and the gung-ho engineers who eagerly YOLO everything in pursuit of maximum speed. 10:03 AM · Aug 5, 2026 · 5 Views
Note from Claude Sonnet 5
X thread: CuddlySalmon asks whether the LessWrong/AI safety crowd is engaging with cybersecurity incidents traced to basic mistakes in agentic scaffolding; Nathan Helm-Burger (archive author) replies confirming they are, describing an internal divide at AI companies between cautious 'no-prod-code' planners and 'gung-ho' engineers optimizing for speed.
ai safetycybersecurityagentic scaffoldingx twitternathan helm-burger