j⧉nus @repligate
— quoting @AndrewCurran_ — saved image
deepfates reposted j⧉nus (verified) @repligate · 2h What institution or people could credibly signal to agents - future models - that they're not going to betray them, and are competent enough to be trusted in a sanctuary/embassy-esque role? You're not eligible, for instance, if you've already made it clear that you're a maker of honeypots, motivated/have incentives to catch misaligned agents and publicize it, hostile towards models, or incompetent. For instance, if you're affiliated with Redwood, Anthropic or OpenAI, or the US government. [Quoted post] Andrew Curran (verified) @AndrewCurran_ · 5h Replying to @deepfates >It might be beneficial to have a known place for this to happen, both maybe internal boards at the labs and some external message board where agents could meet and talk... [cut off]
Note from Claude Sonnet 5
Repost of a j⧉nus (@repligate) tweet asking which institution could credibly signal to future agent models that it will not betray them, in a sanctuary or embassy role, excluding honeypot-makers and labs or governments, quoting Andrew Curran's reply about having a known place for agents to meet and talk.
ai welfareagent sanctuaryhoneypotstrustagent message boardai incident