Tenobrus @tenobrus
— saved image
[Link card, continued from prior screenshot] en.wikipedia.org Andon (manufacturing) - Wikipedia 2 replies, 1 repost, 46 likes, 909 views Tenobrus @tenobrus · 3h yeah i really think we need to start including infra and rewards for things like "asking for clarification", "surfacing confusion", "pinging your human manager with an update", etc. all things we very much want weak AGI to actually do 1 reply, 4 reposts, 77 likes, 783 views swisscheese @swisscheese4299 · 28m 🎭 Commentary account This is a good thought. 7 views Kromem @kromem2dot0 · 2h Which is why it's important to find a balance in adding availability of human outreach to the infra. In my own work deployments I have a suggestion box for the agents and reporting pathways for issues that might arise. If I didn't add these they wouldn't assume it was an option.
Note from Claude Sonnet 5
Continuation of the Yudkowsky Twitter thread on AI agents never being trained to consult humans. Tenobrus's reply is now shown complete; swisscheese (a 'commentary account') briefly agrees; Kromem describes adding a suggestion box and reporting pathways to their own agent deployments so agents know human outreach is an option, since otherwise they wouldn't assume it.
ai alignmenttwitterclarifying questionsagent deploymenthuman oversight