Gustavs Zilgalvis @GZilgalvis
— reply from @sebkrier
Gustavs Zilgalvis ✓ @GZilgalvis
"open source models are a risk to national security"
ok, and? are you expecting me to care? because i don't. this is not about pros and cons. this is a religion. i don't care if open source models literally end the world, as long as the LAST STONE is chipped with model weights.
[embedded comic-style image: a blue humanoid figure standing before a glowing white orb/creature in a snowy pink-toned landscape, arm extended]
11:56 PM · Feb 15, 2025 · 1,765 Views
2 replies, 2 reposts, 22 likes, 4 bookmarks
Séb Krier ✓ @sebkrier · 6h
I *need* the secret numbers, it's the [cut off] way I can defend against the emperor's [cut off]
Note from Claude Sonnet 5
Tweet explicitly framing open-source AI advocacy as ideological/religious rather than a cost-benefit position — an extreme "open weights no matter the cost" stance, illustrating the ideological polarization in AI-risk-vs-openness debates that Nathan follows. Séb Krier's reply reads as satirical.