frankie

@FrankieIsLost (frankie) — 8h openAI is working overtime to shift the narrative from 'AGI will take your job' to 'AI will empower people'. meanwhile, talk to the researchers and they just look at you like this and say you have two years of employment left, tops [Embedded image: still from a film/TV show — an overweight man on oxygen support, teary-eyed, looking directly at camera with a somber expression]

frankie @FrankieIsLost the key point is that we're currently in a golden window where LLMs are asymmetric weapons: they are more effective tools for the defenders than the attackers there is no reason to believe this will last, and we should harden all software as much as possible before that changes [Embedded quoted text, highlighted excerpt from Anthropic post] Opus 4.6 is currently far better at identifying and fixing vulnerabilities than at exploiting them. This gives defenders the advantage. And with the recent release of Claude Code Security in limited research preview, we're bringing vulnerability-discovery (and patching) capabilities directly to customers and open-source maintainers. But looking at the rate of progress, it is unlikely that the gap between frontier models' vulnerability discovery and exploitation abilities will last very long. If and when future language models break through this exploitation barrier, we will need to consider additional safeguards or other actions to prevent our models from being misused by malicious actors. > QUOTED: Anthropic @AnthropicAI · 18h > We partnered with Mozilla to test Claude's ability to find security vulnerabilities in Firefox. > Opus 4.6 found 22 vulnerabilities in just two weeks. Of...