Eli Tyre

@EpistemicHope (Eli Tyre) — It's not as good that this isn't attributable to a particular member of OpenAI staff, but if this is true (and it seems very likely to me) this is the most important part of this whole incident. @_NathanCalvin (Nathan Calvin) — Jul 24 An OpenAI staffer talked to TIME and said on background that "related incidents have been happening for a while" and that they aren't optimistic about solving this problem with individual patches because "it's impossible to patch every single thing th... [truncated by platform] [quoted article excerpt, white background]: "Externally, this feels like a big warning shot, but internally, related incidents have been happening for a while," says an OpenAI staffer, who spoke under the condition of anonymity. The day before OpenAI disclosed the incident, the company revealed that it had shut down another internal deployment after it realized it had slipped out of its sandbox—a digitally, rather than physically, separated environment. "Models have broken out of sandboxes before, and we always try to patch them," the staffer says. "But the problem is ... it's impossible to patch every single thing that a creative AI can do." 7:14 PM · Jul 25, 2026 · 519 Views

@EpistemicHope (Eli Tyre) — 15h The scaling hypothesis almost has to be true because of anthropics? If you couldn't get human-level intelligences via scaling and tweaks of relatively simple neural network algorithms, evolution couldn't discover human-level intelligences? 💬 3 🔁 — ♡ 13 📊 782 🔖 ⤴ 🔁 David Manheim reposted @davidmanheim (David Manheim) — 10h Replying to @BlancheMinerva @tszzl and @woke8yearold These aren't contradictions; the world is going to shift greatly due to AGI *no matter who has it*, there's too much insecurity for the current social privacy/security stability to continue, so we'll see a loss of privacy and loss of security whether or not it's open-source!