← Timeline

@pozsgaybalazs

@pozsgaybalazs on X

2 captures, most recent first. Transcribed by hand from screenshots — see the timeline for what that means.

@pozsgaybalazs

— saved image

Balázs Pozsgay @pozsgaybalazs · 1h
Maybe AI hasn't killed mathematics, but it killed the Miklós Schweitzer competition, a traditional and prestigious competition in Hungary. The rules were simple: 10-11 problems, one week for the students, they lock themselves into their rooms, and try to do what they can. Today I was informed that the Schweitzer competition will never be held in the same form. AI systems solved all problems from last year, now the whole thing is pointless. They will something else instead, perhaps just discuss nice problems, but not in the form of an actual competition.

I never participated in "the Schweitzer", instead I did the physics competition, the Ortvay. I haven't heard yet what the organizers will do this year. In the last couple of years I always posed a problem, I was reviewing the solutions. AI use was allowed last year, but the students had to disclose it. However, very few did disclose it, despite apparent signs. The best solution for my problem from last year was someone who did it clearly without AI. Last year, free AI systems were not yet capable of solving my problem, and at the time of submitting it only ChatGPT Pro could do it, and not in one shot. However, the situation likely changed since then.
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Tweet by Balázs Pozsgay saying AI systems solved all of last year's problems in Hungary's Miklós Schweitzer mathematics competition, so it will not be held in its traditional form; he also describes AI-use disclosure problems in the Ortvay physics competition, where he sets a problem.

ai and competitionsmiklos schweitzermathematicseducationai disclosureortvay

@pozsgaybalazs

— web clipping, 243 words — published 2026-08-14

Post by @pozsgaybalazs on X

Recently Sol made significant progress in one of my research projects. The idea is simple... yet I don't think it would have crossed my mind. Earlier openAI models never had this idea, in fact, they produced completely mistaken proof attempts. So strange, it needs an immense computing power to come up with something really simple. This feels like creativity. Many human innovations in computations seem simple once they are there... but it took time until someone found them. Now I am digesting the computation, and I am instructing Sol Ultra to solve the most general case. It is not there yet. This is about brickwork quantum circuits with "Yang-Baxter gates". I am learning a lot. The experience is like a strange combination of being a PI and a student. A new experience for sure. How will the future look like? Everyone is talking about this. No idea. This is fun for the moment. But I don't expect it will last very long. --- ##### Comments > **NeuSatz @NeuSatz1sw** · [2026-08-15](https://x.com/NeuSatz1sw/status/2088588412077130228) > > May I ask what do you mean by “I don’t expect it will last very long”? > > > **Balázs Pozsgay @pozsgaybalazs** · [2026-08-15](https://x.com/pozsgaybalazs/status/2088646611467411922) > > > > Right now humans are better in chosing the questions, and AI helps with problem solving. However, soon AI could become better also in asking the right questions, and the comes the era of autonomous AI research. Then we will become spectators and interpreters.