— quoting @artetxem — saved image
Ben Clavié @bclavie · 18h Something a few PhD students discussed with me already: since no one cares about conference prestige anymore except institutional bodies, they're fully optimising their paper for ChatGPT reviews. They fine near 100% agreement between their final score and sufficient GPT reviews. [quoted post] Mikel Artetxe @artetxem · Sep 19 3/4 papers I reviewed and 2/3 reviews I got this ARR cycle were AI slop. Fraudsters are already outnumbering honest researchers. Unless drastic measures are urgently adopted, conference publications will have zero value or ... [cut off]
Note from Claude Sonnet 5
A tweet by Ben Clavié saying PhD students are optimising papers against ChatGPT reviews, quote-tweeting Mikel Artetxe's complaint that most papers he reviewed and reviews he received this ARR cycle were AI slop.
peer reviewai slopacademic publishingarrconference reviewing