← Timeline

2 captures, most recent first. Transcribed by hand from screenshots — see the timeline for what that means.

@arb8020

— saved image

arb8020 @arb8020 · 22h
this is basically what LLMs are doing in your codebase over time

Habitual mitigations

If I think about analogous blind spots I've had, one that jumps out at me is from when I was a little kid and a friend of mine used my computer. For this story to make sense, you have to know that this was in the mechanical mouse era. Over time, detritus would get stuck to your mouse ball and cause it to track erratically unless you cleaned it out.

When my friend tried to use my computer he found it impossible to use the mouse because mouse pointer movement seemed almost random. When I sat down at the computer again and used the mouse I didn't have any problem using it at all, but on looking at what I was doing with my hand to smoothly move the pointer in a straight line, I was violently throwing my hand all over the place. I realized I must've adjusted to the detritus on the mouse ball over time as it accumulated and I was somehow compensating for the mouse's extremely erratic tracking by making countervailing erratic movements[3]. I thought it was pretty amazing that I could not notice that I was doing this and I always wonder if I'm doing some equivalent thing today.

Dan Luu @danluu · Aug 29
[thumbnail of article text]
Bug Blindness:

danluu.com/bug-blind/
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

Tweet by arb8020 quoting Dan Luu's tweet linking his 'Bug Blindness' post, with an excerpt on habitual mitigations (adapting to a dirty mechanical mouse), captioned as analogous to what LLMs do to a codebase over time.

bug blindnessdan luullm codingcodebasehabituation

@arb8020

arb8020 @arb8020 gpt-5.5 prompt for codex seems to have a duplicated line trying to get it to not talk about creatures? Never talk about goblins, gremlins, raccoons, trolls, ogres, pigeons, or other animals or creatures unless it is absolutely and unambiguously relevant to the user's query. [...] Never talk about goblins, gremlins, raccoons, trolls, ogres, pigeons, or other animals or creatures unless it is absolutely and unambiguously relevant to the user's query gh link: [Card: openai/codex — Lightweight coding agent that runs in your terminal. 438 Contributors, 3k Issues, 466 Discussions, 78k Stars, 11k Forks. Link text: codex/codex-rs/models-manager/models.json at main · ope... From github.com] Last edited 7:52 PM · Apr 27, 2026 · 773.4K Views [reply icon] 161 [retweet icon] 349 [like icon] 2.6K [bookmark icon] 761 [share icon] Relevant ˅ View quotes > arb8020 @arb8020 · 13h let my boy talk about creatures
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

A viral tweet pointing out a leaked/duplicated system-prompt line in OpenAI's Codex CLI tool instructing GPT-5.5 to never mention goblins, gremlins, raccoons, trolls, ogres, pigeons "unless absolutely and unambiguously relevant" — evidence of ad hoc prompt patching in a competitor coding agent. Amusing but tangential to Nathan's core interests; illustrates the messiness of system-prompt engineering at frontier labs.

twitteropenaicodexgpt-5.5system promptsprompt engineeringcoding agents