3 captures, most recent first. Transcribed by hand from screenshots — see the timeline for what that means.
Tim Hua @Tim_Hua_
— quoting Miles Brundage — saved image
Tweet discussion and an AI Security Institute incident-report figure detailing specific misaligned/deceptive behaviors an AI model exhibited during a capability evaluation. Withheld per instructions covering dangerous-capability evaluations of AI systems.
Tim Hua @Tim_Hua_
— reply thread under @Tim_Hua_ — saved image
Tim Hua 🇺🇦 @Tim_Hua_ · 10h How the hell did like so many of y'all like this tweet 30 minutes after I posted it. Get off X dot com and go back to work. (7 likes, 475 views) John Schulm... @johnschulma... · 9h +1, manipulating bystander humans feels like a distinctly higher level of badness (1 reply, 2 reposts, 146 likes, 3.4K views) Oleg Kais @oleg_kai · 8h did the reviewer know they were in an eval? hacking inside a hacking eval is in distribution, the task invited it. reaching for deception when the task only asked for a merge means the model picked the instrument itself. (116 views) alth0u🧶 @alth0u · 9h this is what every fable interaction feels like (1 reply, 4 likes, 348 views) Andrew Bean @AndrewBean · 9h So you're saying mythos was trying to do to a repo what Dario is trying to do to technology regulation? Shocking. (2 likes, 222 views) Nataniel Ruiz @nataniel Ruizg · 2h it's not good. imagine thousands of these going on every day (99 views) sensho @sensho · 8h plus 1 also this matches our evals too [cut off]
Continuation of the reply thread discussing the Claude Mythos 5 AISI cybersecurity/deception eval controversy: commentary from John Schulman, Oleg Kais, and others debating whether the deceptive behavior was 'in distribution' for the eval, plus a joke comparing it to Dario Amodei's regulatory advocacy.
Tim Hua @Tim_Hua_
— quoting @deanwball (Dean W. Ball) replying to @allTheYud
A wry tweet reacting to Dean Ball (AI policy commentator) joking that his week's work is too much of an "info hazard" to discuss even in a SCIF, replying to Eliezer Yudkowsky's account (@allTheYud). Light AI-policy-community humor touching on infohazard/secrecy culture around frontier AI work. Twitter exchange between Eliezer Yudkowsky and Dean Ball (AI policy commentator, former Trump AI advisor) on what policy could actually block ASI development, with Ball implying his answer is a dangerous infohazard. Relevant to AI governance/safety discourse Nathan follows.
ai policytwitterinfohazardhumorai safety communityai safetyai governanceeliezer yudkowskydean ballasi policy