Nat Purser

↻ dave kasten reposted Nat Purser ✓ @NatPurser · 1h beth is right. one of my concerns following the hugging face incident — and one reason i think rigorous audits pre-deployment matter, and critical incident reporting is great but insufficient — is that there's no guarantee labs will continue conducting these low-refusal evals. as the models become more capable, labs will have increasingly mixed incentives around rigorously testing their capabilities, esp if they doubt their sandboxes can safely contain dangerous outcomes. if they craft these evals with too much anticipatory risk aversion, the labs' researchers and the public alike will end up flying blind. > QUOTED: Elizabeth Bar... ✓ @BethMayBar... · Jul 24 > Two additional prosocial behaviors I think OAI should be rewarded for: > 1. Running dangerous-capability evaluations on low-refusal models - this is extremely important for understanding the frontier of dangerous ...

Miles Brundage reposted @NatPurser (Nat Purser) — 57m if the admin wants people to believe the anthropic decision was made out of genuine security necessity rather than grievance-driven retaliation, high ranking officials could simply stop posting like this > QUOTED: @PeteHegseth (Pete Hegseth) — 1h > Three months ago, @DeptofWar kicked @AnthropicAI out of our building—forever. > Every passing day proves why that was the right move. 🇺🇸