← Timeline

@ID_AA_Carmack

@ID_AA_Carmack on X

1 capture, most recent first. Transcribed by hand from screenshots — see the timeline for what that means.

@ID_AA_Carmack

reply from LaurieWired @lauriewired

John Carmack @ID_AA_Carmack 256 Tb/s data rates over 200 km distance have been demonstrated on single mode fiber optic, which works out to 32 GB of data in flight, "stored" in the fiber, with 32 TB/s bandwidth. Neural network inference and training can have deterministic weight reference patterns, so it is amusing to consider a system with no DRAM, and weights continuously streamed into an L2 cache by a recycling fiber loop. The modern equivalent of the ancient mercury echo tube memories. You would need to pipeline a bunch of them to implement modern trillion parameter models, but fiber transmission may have a better growth trajectory than DRAM does today, so it might someday become viable. Much more practically, you should be able to gang cheap flash memory together to provide almost any read bandwidth you require, as long as it is done a page at a time and pipelined well ahead. That should be viable for inference serving today if flash and accelerator vendors could agree on a high speed interface. 10:23 AM · Feb 6, 2026 · 157.7K Views 152 replies, 211 reposts, 2.3K likes, 564 bookmarks LaurieWired @lauriewired · 5h Ah that's so neat! My favorite fact about delay-line memory is that the propagation of the waves in a fluid medium is obviously very temperature dependent which messes up CPU timings.
Note from Claude Sonnet 5

John Carmack musing on speculative hardware architectures for neural network inference/training — using fiber-optic delay lines as memory (analogous to historical mercury delay-line memory) and flash-memory ganging for bandwidth — as alternatives to DRAM for trillion-parameter models. Hardware/infrastructure trivia, tangential to Nathan's AI interests but not core to safety/welfare/consciousness threads.

twitterhardwareneural network inferencefiber opticsmemory architecturejohn carmack